Proud to stand with the workers at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB has returned over $21 billion back to taxpayers since its creation in 2011 and Trump shut them down. Let them work!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Vermont at-large
Becca Balint
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 537
Yes40%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
At-Large District
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Becca Balint
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVermont at-large
SoupScore
Becca's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 125 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
TODAY: Call your Republican representatives and tell them to protect the CFPB.
We have an aging population, a workforce crisis, and a housing crisis in Vermont. This is the perfect storm that directly hurts working people. We need to attract more workers and younger families and make sure we have a housing market that allows them to stay.
Keep calling your representatives and senators. Especially your state’s Republicans. Your voices, your calls work.
Reposted byRepresentative Becca Balint
Today, we're announcing that a historic 191 Members of the U.S. House have joined the Congressional Equality Caucus this Congress—the most we've ever had at the start of a Congress!
See our full membership, led by Chair @repmarktakano.bsky.social, at the link in our bio.
Vermonters, save the date!
I will be hosting a tele-town hall on February 26th at 6:30PM. A chance for me to hear directly from you and share updates from Washington. Stay tuned for the dial-in details.
Hope you'll join me!
I'm not going to budge on funding Social Security and Medicare. It’s not an option. I don't care what Elon tries.
Reposted byRepresentative Becca Balint
TODAY: @balint.house.gov joins the #SundayShow to explain why she argues that Trump's attempts to shut down federal agencies is "textbook authoritarianism." 6 pm ET @msnbc.com
@justsecurity.org is tracking the legal challenges to the Trump administration’s illegal, unconstitutional attacks. Check it out to learn more!
When is the last time you were brave?
But this week, her oil company in Canada said she owed more because prices went up due to Trump’s tariffs — despite her prepaid contract.
The tariffs may have been "paused," but Vermonters are still paying them. Tell the White House to fix this.
Ready for a real-life tariff story?
My staff spoke with a Vermonter who prepaid in the fall for all of the oil she needs to heat her home for this entire winter season.
⬇️
Do what you can, when you can. Be sure to take time to recharge.
Reposted byRepresentative Becca Balint
If you are a public servant, or know one, this may be useful. A new organization, the Public Service Alliance, is offering advice on privacy and cybersecurity, physical safety, access to legal counsel and more.
thepublicservicealliance.com/introducing-...
A true opposition party starts now. In the minority in every branch of government, our default needs to be NO! NO, this does nothing to help working people.
Elon Musk is the richest man in the world in large part because of his contracts with the government. Now he's a government employee, opening up sprawling conflicts of interest from this position.
It must be investigated immediately.
Teachers and schools are already underfunded and they want to leave our schools with even less resources and give it to billionaires.
Parents and grandparents want their kids to do better than they did. How's that going to happen? Education. This isn't possible if Trump closes the Department of Education.
It's absolutely outrageous that they want to take money away from our kids to give it to billionaires.
Reposted byRepresentative Becca Balint
@karaswisher.bsky.social says that when media accepts Elon Musk's framing around his governement takeover, he wins the battle on Out Front with @erinburnett.bsky.social on CNN
Trump's flood-the-zone strategy means things are going to get missed by the media. That's intentional. So I wanted to point out two major things he's done to deeply hurt workers and consumers.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History537 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
537 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.