If bagels cost $7 in one market and $400 at another across the street, you’d ask the grocery managers some tough questions. Well, that’s Rx drugs under the control of the pharmacy benefit managers — the middlemen of drug pricing. www.cap-rx.com/insights/ah0...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 618
Yes44%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
From the CEO: "We would ask for a sensible tariff policy that would benefit a company that has invested in domestic manufacturing, against the tide of our industry. Instead, we're being punished for sticking with U.S. manufacturing."
This family business manufactures textiles in my district. Trump's tariffs are hurting it by raising input prices.
www.wsj.com/opinion/how-...
As the father of three children under 6, I do not want their brains programmed by corporations, like software.
The miners and merchants of dopamine use bits of software — social media, pornography, online gambling and other apps — to deliver quick hits of the chemical, keeping you coming back for more and cutting out the real world.
Corporations are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to capture this reward system.
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/04/o...
GOP senator votes to confirm anti-vaxxer, is shocked by anti-vax policy.
The NIH is withholding funding from Massachusetts scientists. We’re going to fight back, secure the grants, and advance science.
www.masslive.com/politics/202...
New school year, new school shooting. Instead of wasting ink searching for a motive, which only serves this child murderer’s ego, the focus must be on gun policy. Easy access to guns is a choice, and it costs lives.
apnews.com/article/minn...
Strength: strangling Russian oil exports & sending 300 billion euros of its frozen assets to Ukraine's military. Then, summoning Putin to negotiations with NATO + Ukraine.
youtu.be/HhZZlUZQPqo
With such a slapdash summit, the best one can hope for is that Trump pressures Putin to release Ukrainian children as a trust-building measure to advance talks.
RFK Jr. talks about chronic disease, but has delivered corruption & quackery instead. From NIH reform to fighting Big Food, there's plenty of bipartisan potential. But not when grift is their game.
www.bloomberg.com/news/newslet...
It’s not his ‘next’ target. It’s always been the target. RFK Jr. is going to use VICP to derail vaccine development & distribution.
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/11/h...
His ultimate aim is to link the aluminum in vaccines to autism, without evidence, in order to prevent the development or distribution of vaccines. RFK Jr. and his hangers-on will profit from litigation, while Americans will contract preventable infectious diseases.
The Secretary has also loaded up the vaccine advisory body with anti-vaxxers, refused to endorse vaccines during a measles outbreak, and politicized the Food & Drug Administration's safety & efficacy studies.
RFK Jr.'s termination of funding for mRNA vaccines is his latest anti-science assault on public health.
apnews.com/article/kenn...
End the social media corporations’ special immunity, prevent them from imposing terms & conditions on pre-teens, and make them pay their taxes.
youtu.be/zAu6Orpc02o
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is an engine of better health and economic development. Congress knows that, economists know that, and Bay Staters know that. Any attempts to cut the NIH must be stopped cold.
I am encouraged that the CBO is quantifying the bounty of science, as it will support Congress in investing in our future.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History618 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
618 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.