Today, we celebrate the contributions of DACA recipients and recommit ourselves to building an immigration system that reflects our values, respects the dignity of immigrants, and recognizes that America is stronger because of them.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26
Julia Brownley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 583
Yes41%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 26
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 271 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Their futures should not be defined by uncertainty or political gridlock. They deserve the stability, security, and opportunity that come with permanent protections and a pathway to citizenship.
DACA recipients have done everything asked of them and more. They came forward, passed background checks, and placed their trust in a promise that they could build their lives in the country they love. Fourteen years later, they are still waiting for Congress to act.
Today marks 14 years since DACA first opened doors and opportunities for hundreds of thousands of young people who know America as their home.
For 14 years, DACA recipients have strengthened our communities, contributed to our economy, powered our workforce, started businesses, and raised families.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
Donald Trump is spending MILLIONS on a UFC fight while Americans struggle to afford food, gas and healthcare. Let that sink in.
Wenqing's artwork will be displayed in the U.S. Capitol for the next year alongside winning entries from congressional districts across the country.
I am proud that visitors to the Capitol will have the opportunity to experience her creativity and talent as they walk its historic halls.
Art is a powerful form of expression that allows young people to share their perspectives, experiences, and ideas, and I am proud of every student who participated and shared something meaningful through their work.
Congratulations to Wenqing Lu, a sophomore at Oak Park High School and winner of the 2026 Congressional Art Competition for California's 26th Congressional District!
Wenqing's winning piece reflects the remarkable creativity, talent, and artistic vision of students across our region.
I urge the Senate to immediately pass this War Powers Resolution and send a clear message that no president has the unilateral authority to drag the United States into another prolonged and unnecessary war.
Congress must act to restore accountability before more servicemembers and innocent civilians are placed in harm’s way.
Donald Trump has offered no credible objective, no defined timeline, and no serious plan to prevent further escalation. Military force cannot substitute for principled American leadership, sustained diplomacy, and a clear strategy to prevent a wider conflict in the Middle East.
The American people have opposed this reckless conflict from the start, and they should not be forced to bear the human, economic, and national security consequences of a war driven by political grievance and impulsive decision-making rather than strategy or diplomacy.
Today, after weeks of unnecessary delay, the House finally passed this urgent resolution to reassert Congress’s constitutional authority and push back against Trump’s unlawful escalation toward a broader regional war.
From the very beginning of this conflict, Democrats have fought to advance a War Powers Resolution to end Donald Trump’s unauthorized and reckless war in Iran.
We must restore integrity, fairness, and professionalism at the Department of Defense and reject this dangerous effort to turn our military into a partisan instrument of Donald Trump’s agenda.
This is blatant racism and misogyny that elevates mediocrity at the expense of meritocracy. These servicemembers earned their ranks through service and sacrifice, and they deserve to be recognized and respected for their leadership.
It is deeply offensive that one of the most unqualified Defense Secretaries in modern history feels entitled to undermine military leadership decisions not based on readiness or performance, but because of political grievance and personal bias.
His relentless attacks on the military’s apolitical, merit-based promotion system are dangerous and fundamentally un-American. Hegseth has fired, sidelined, marginalized, and effectively demoted accomplished women and servicemembers of color who have dedicated their careers to defending our country.
Instead of providing the steady leadership and reassurance our troops deserve during an active conflict, Pete Hegseth has chosen to wage a political and ideological war inside the Department of Defense.
Today and every day, I am proud to stand with LGBTQ+ individuals and families throughout Ventura County and across the country.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History583 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
583 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12