Joaquin Castro headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 20
Born
September 16, 1974
Age 51
Phone
(202) 225-3236
Office
2241 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 20

Joaquin Castro

Joaquin Castro is an American lawyer and Democratic politician who has represented Texas's 20th congressional district in the United States House of Representatives since 2013. The district includes just over half of his native San Antonio. He currently serves on the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 552
Yes39%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 20

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Joaquin Castro headshot
Joaquin Castro
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 20
SoupScore
Joaquin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 103 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byJoaquin Castro
Incredible: Russ Vought’s daughter has cystic fibrosis and benefits from a “miracle drug” made possible by the National Institutes of Health—an agency Vought now aims to gut as part of the Project 2025 attack www.motherjones.com/politics/202... Scoop from @motherjones.com’s @metrauxjulia.bsky.social
San Antonio – I’ve heard from thousands of people worried about efforts to radically change Social Security, public education & other important programs. Tomorrow at 6:30 pm, I’m holding a Telephone Town Hall to share how I'm responding & hear your concerns. Join online at Castro.House.gov/live.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
Reporter: Why do you want to be chairman of Kennedy Center board? Trump: Some of the shows were terrible. They were a disgrace. Reporter: Have you seen any shows there? Trump: No, I didn’t go.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
New tonight Elon Musk retweets a post contemplating DOGE or the Trump administration defy a court order imposed by a federal judge “I don’t like the precedent it sets when you defy a judicial ruling, but I’m just wondering what other options are these judges leaving us”
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
This shows that "doxxing" has become a meaningless, catch-all phrase for anything these guys do not like reported. @klong.bsky.social is an impressive reporter, who simply connected the anonymous postings of a self-declared racist to the public identity of someone directly altering government.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
Remember as you see news of bird flu cases spreading- the Musk-Trump Administration is weakening our scientific and medical agencies, and preventing them from responding
Virginia Mercury -- Virginia Lawmakers To Cdc: Restart Bird Flu Reports Now Led by @beyer.house.gov with @mcclellan.house.gov @bobbyscott.house.gov @connolly.house.gov @repvindman.bsky.social @repsuhas.bsky.social virginiamercury.com/2025/02/06/v...
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
New: We spoke to government IT employees/contractors about DOGE. Their warnings were dire. The people who maintain the systems that keep the country working are terrified. "This is the largest data breach and the largest IT security breach in our country’s history—at least that’s publicly known."
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
US farmers sold $2 billion of food to USAID. Not any more. - US farmers provided 41% of food delivered by USAID - $340M of purchases/shipments are now paused. Over 680,000 tonnes. - Food stranded in Houston - Aid stopped in transit. The world’s poor starving, food rotting & US farmers screwed.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
It's important to keep emphasizing that what Musk proposes in this tweet is illegal. Congress created the CFPB, just as it created USAID, the DOE, etc. Neither the President nor a billionaire can dissolve them by fiat. Doing so is a violation of the law and the President's constitutional duties.
Guy wanting to make payment app knifing agency that regulates payment apps prospect.org/economy/2025...
I’ve been getting calls from military & national security spouses worried about losing the jobs they depend on when their families are stationed away from home. @chrisvanhollen.bsky.social, @corybooker.com & I led a letter asking OPM to clarify their exemption from the telework ban. No response.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
A teen DOGE staffer recently given access to government systems worked at a startup known for hiring convicted hackers. Someone using a Telegram handle associated with him also solicited a cyberattack-for-hire service in 2022. All raising questions about his vetting. www.wired.com/story/edward...
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
Republicans are trying to destroy the agency that keeps San Antonians safe on the job. They want to make it easier for big corporations and unscrupulous bosses to commit wage theft and abuse workers. What they’re doing is illegal and dangerous.
Republicans are trying to destroy the agency that keeps San Antonians safe on the job. They want to make it easier for big corporations and unscrupulous bosses to commit wage theft and abuse workers. What they’re doing is illegal and dangerous.
Reposted byJoaquin Castro
Republicans ran into the room to SHEILD Elon Musk from having to come and speak to Congress. They want their billionaire takeover done behind closed doors. The people deserve transparency. No one elected Elon Musk.
I’m in Oversight Committee right now. Ranking Member Connolly just called for a vote to subpoena Elon Musk. Republicans out-number us on this committee, but many aren’t in the room. We’ll see who wins this vote. We deserve transparency and answers.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
552 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12