Veronica Escobar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 16
Born
September 15, 1969
Age 56
Phone
(202) 225-4831
Office
2448 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 16

Veronica Escobar

Voting Record — 614
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 16

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Veronica Escobar headshot
Veronica Escobar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 16
SoupScore
Veronica's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Russell Vought had no shame or second thoughts about lying to the American people about this bill. It's because they know it's unpopular and they're hoping Americans are not informed. Don't let them win.
It WILL hurt Americans who rely on Medicaid for healthcare. It WILL hurt Americans who work at hospitals that shut down. It WILL hurt Americans in rural communities that'll no longer have access to healthcare.
Which brings us to his final point: 5. "No one will lose coverage." When your whole argument is that the cuts are only to prevent "fraud, waste, and abuse" and "kick undocumented migrants off Medicaid," but the data doesn't support it, who will it hurt?
3. "We need more work requirements because there's too many people on Medicaid and SNAP not working." The only part that "works" about work requirements is that they kick more people off programs with new red tape. More red tape = people are less inclined to use the program.
2. He says that "1 out of every $5 or $6 in Medicaid is improper." Clearly his implication is that because of this data, it's justified to cut ~20% of Medicaid. What he chooses to leave out is that "improper" is a specific term used by the government.
1. The Republican budget bill "preserves and protects" social safety net programs. A blatant lie as I'm unaware of how cutting over a trillion dollars and kicking millions of Americans off health care is "preserving and protecting" this program.
In case you're not familiar with Vought, he's a right-wing Trump loyalist who's worked for him for years. He wrote a chapter for Project 2025 arguing for the "aggressive use of the vast powers of the executive branch." So what were his lies? www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Over the weekend, the White House Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Project 2025 author Russell Vought spent his morning on CNN lying about the Republican budget bill. Let's break this down 🧵
Authoritarianism doesn't just happen overnight. Alarm bells should be going off for every American when newspapers that are supposed to keep elected officials in check instead cave for fear of retribution, financial loss, or both.
Today, let us honor the men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in service of our country. Freedom isn’t free; it’s preserved by those who gave everything in protection of our American values. May we continue to be a grateful nation forever.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
614 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 13Next →