Fighting for our federal employees. We have your backs.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align93%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
SW Ohio — we will always want to hear from you ➡️
landsman.house.gov/contact
People are pissed. They want their voices to be heard.
We will continue to host town halls and show up in SW Ohio.
www.cincinnati.com/story/news/p...
Instead of focusing on culture war issues and political retribution, he should come to Congress and work with us on solutions to fix real problems that the vast majority of Americans want to see solved.
We have to go back to these speeches being serious and helpful. Not what happened last night.
As a member of Congress, my top priority is improving the lives of children and families – which is why I am working to fix our economy and lower prices for hardworking people, address our housing crisis, and increase access to quality, affordable healthcare, and education.
Elected officials should be focused on finding solutions to the real issues impacting Americans every day.
At no point did he discuss fixing our economy for the middle and working class.
Not one mention of Medicaid, Medicare, or Social Security – despite the fact that his Administration and Republicans in Congress are actively working to cut these programs.
I had hoped Trump would talk about holding Pharmacy Benefit Managers and big corporations accountable for taking advantage of people like Ken — or anything on the healthcare reform we desperately need. He didn’t.
I attended the joint address with my guest, Ken Green, who lives with Type 1 diabetes and is struggling to pay for life-saving medication because of the high cost of prescription drugs.
Trump has spent his 1st month in office:
- Gutting the critical agencies that Americans rely on
- Indiscriminately firing workers
- Withholding billions of dollars from our communities
- Implementing policies that will raise prices for hardworking people
- Siding with dictators over democracies.
He presented a negative, backward-looking vision for our country, and failed to even mention the real challenges facing millions of Americans – let alone provide a plan for how to address them.
Trump chose to use this moment to further divide our country, focusing on culture war issues, past grievances, and political revenge and retribution.
A speech like this is supposed to be a time to lay out a clear, coherent plan to address our greatest issues.
His speech was not that.
Trump’s speech to Congress last night felt like a campaign rally, and not at all what the country needs right now.
Reflections on the speech from a Midwest member of Congress who still believes in public service 🧵👇🏻
Our first bill this Congress, the Saving Seniors Money on Prescriptions Act, takes on rising drug prices to ensure the cost savings go directly to our seniors.
Read more ➡️ landsman.house.gov/posts/landsm...
Ken Green has had Type 1 diabetes his whole life. Like so many others, he’s been at the mercy of rising prescription drug costs.
Grateful he could join me at the joint session to tell his story— because no one should have to worry about affording the medication they need to live.
Now we need the Republican-majority to wake up, and hold this Administration accountable.
Instead, 100% of tax relief should go to
working people, the middle class, small businesses, and farmers.
Paid for by requiring the uber-wealthy to pay all of their taxes.
It’s that simple.
Renewing the American dream does not mean actively raising prices or wasting trillions in tax giveaways to the uber-wealthy at the expense of everyone else.
They seem to want a shutdown. They have the power and responsibility to avoid a disastrous shutdown.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.