Trump can deny climate change all he wants. The heat wave punishing the country this week doesn’t care what he thinks.
Scientists just confirmed this kind of extreme heat would have been “virtually impossible” before we started burning fossil fuels at scale.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes46%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 101 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Veterans are waiting on care. Communities need disaster relief. And the People’s House sits idle because the Speaker can’t manage his own members.
If Mike Johnson can’t do the job, he should step aside and make room for someone who will actually lead this Congress and serve the American people.
ICYMI: The House isn’t voting today. Why? Because Mike Johnson, the weakest Speaker in the history of our institution, once again couldn’t hold his own caucus together long enough to accomplish a single thing all week.
Families are struggling with costs.
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
A big reason I wanted a seat on Energy and Water Appropriations was to fight for local infrastructure projects exactly like this.
I’ll keep fighting proposed cuts to the Army Corps budget that could slow this work down. Oceanside has waited long enough. We are going to see this through.
This month, the Army Corps finally released its draft. It recommends placing 4 million cubic yards of sand along our beaches, with renourishment every 10 years.
This is real progress for a community that has watched a generation lose its beaches.
Congress ordered a study in 2000 and gave the Army Corps 44 months to finish it. Instead, it remained unfinished for 26 years, slowed by funding gaps while other priorities moved ahead.
I fought to secure $1.8 million in 2022 and another $2.2 million in 2025 to move this study forward.
For 73 years, Oceanside’s beaches have been disappearing. The federal government acknowledged back in 1953 that Camp Pendleton harbor disrupted the natural flow of sand along our coastline.
But it failed to deliver a lasting solution for decades.
The only way to change it is a constitutional amendment, which takes 2/3 of both chambers plus 3/4 of the states.
Trump’s response was to call on Congress to pass a law instead. Many 7th graders could explain why that does not work.
Free Civics Lesson of the Day.
The Supreme Court just ruled that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship.
Once the Court says the Constitution requires something, no executive order and no ordinary act of Congress can undo it.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Trump administration just killed a federal program that hundreds of small farmers relied on to survive, and the damage is already landing.
The program paid farmers full market price for their crops, then routed that fresh food to food banks and the families who needed it.
You are being asked to treat pure corruption as normal, to shrug at a President personally profiting from a foreign gift the taxpayers paid to upgrade.
In any other administration this would be the scandal that ends a presidency. With Trump, it’s Wednesday.
abcnews.com/Politics/tru...
When Trump leaves office, the plane does not stay with the government. Ownership transfers to his presidential library foundation. In other words, he keeps it.
American taxpayers then paid to retrofit it, with an estimated cost of at least another $400 million (some estimates far higher), for security and communications work in a Texas hangar since last September.
To everyone celebrating the first flight on Qatar Force One today, understand what you are actually applauding.
A foreign government handed the sitting President of the United States a $400 million plane.
“The corrupt official and the man who corrupts the official alike aim at the assassination of the commonwealth itself.” -Theodore Roosevelt
This clearly helps Republicans, whose party already holds a huge advantage with big-money donors.
It is the worst campaign finance ruling since Citizens United, and one of its biggest practical effects has barely entered the public conversation.
www.notus.org/money/suprem...
They paid much higher market prices, by some estimates three to eleven times more for the same airtime.
That wall is now gone. Money donated to party committees can stretch much further in close races, buying far more television for the same dollars, all coordinated tightly with the candidate.
They argued the limits violated the First Amendment.
But one of the biggest practical consequences is about TV ads.
Federal law has long handed candidates the lowest ad rates broadcasters can charge. Party committees have not gotten those rates.
The headlines focus on the Court striking down limits on how much party committees can spend in coordination with their own candidates.
The vote was 6-3, along ideological lines. The case was brought by JD Vance, of all people, then running for Senate, alongside the national Republican committees.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.