PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @RepMikeLevinFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
Meanwhile, the wealthiest 1% get an average tax cut of more than $50,000 a year, every year, for a decade. Republicans claim they’re helping working people with tips and overtime deductions. Those expire in 2028. The tax cuts for millionaires? Permanent. #TrumpRiggedYourTaxReturn
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
Republicans called it the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” As a reminder, here’s what it actually does. $1 trillion cut from Medicaid. $1 trillion in tax cuts for the top 1%. That’s the math from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Surging U.S. gas prices could erase bigger tax refunds, analysis finds
Stanford economists estimate that the typical U.S. household will spend an additional $740 on gas this year because of the jump in global oil prices.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
Meanwhile, the wealthiest 1% get an average tax cut of more than $50,000 a year, every year, for a decade. Republicans claim they’re helping working people with tips and overtime deductions. Those expire in 2028. The tax cuts for millionaires? Permanent. #TrumpRiggedYourTaxReturn
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
10 million Americans are projected to lose health coverage. 4.7 million will lose food assistance. The poorest families in this country will see their incomes go down, not up, once you account for what gets taken away.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
Republicans called it the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” As a reminder, here’s what it actually does. $1 trillion cut from Medicaid. $1 trillion in tax cuts for the top 1%. That’s the math from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Surging U.S. gas prices could erase bigger tax refunds, analysis finds
Stanford economists estimate that the typical U.S. household will spend an additional $740 on gas this year because of the jump in global oil prices.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
No one in this administration has told the families of our service members or their elected representatives what success looks like, or when it ends.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
We are now 46 days into this war. More than 50,000 American troops are in the Middle East, per the Pentagon’s own figures, including 2,200 Marines from Camp Pendleton.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 15(source)
I’m praying for every American in uniform serving today, especially the men and women now being deployed to the Middle East. They deserve our full support and full honesty from our government. That includes a defined mission, a clear objective, and a path home.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
Trump didn’t consult Congress before the bombs fell. He notified some. There is a difference, and it matters enormously. We are spending American lives and treasure in an unauthorized war of choice, and Congress has yet to do its job. The Founders divided war powers to prevent exactly this.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
Every Republican citing the 60-day clock as Trump’s legal cover either hasn't read the War Powers Act or is hoping you haven’t. The law only permits unilateral presidential military hostilities in response to an attack on the US, and this war began with us striking Iran, not the other way around.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
One of the worst takes I’ve heard since this war started is that somehow Congress didn’t need to be consulted during the first 60 days. That’s not what the War Powers Act says. That’s not what the Constitution says. That’s not what any serious legal scholar says.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs. #HealthcareNotTrumpsWar
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs. #HealthcareNotTrumpsWar
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
There are kids who live near these sites. There are wells that draw from these aquifers. There are rivers that run past these plants into communities that have no idea this rule even exists. The cost savings go to the coal companies. The risk is shifted to everyone else.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
This follows the EPA already moving to roll back key mercury emission limits from coal plants earlier this year. It’s a clear pattern of putting coal industry interests ahead of public health protections.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
The proposal scales back cleanup requirements for coal properties near water sources, eases groundwater monitoring, and makes it easier to repurpose coal ash in cement and structural fill.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 14(source)
Lost in the news the past few days is the Trump administration proposing to weaken rules that limit how coal companies handle toxic waste that can reach groundwater. The new rule would let states grant exemptions from standards that keep contaminants like mercury & lead away from your water supply.
EPA proposes gutting rules for handling toxic coal ash, a move that threatens groundwater
The Trump administration on Thursday proposed weakening rules for the disposal of ash produced by burning coal that can contain hazardous heavy metals and contaminate groundwater.
← Newer postsPosts page 22Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYES✓Failed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-01-03—Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTING——Johnson (LA)
2025-01-03—Call by StatesPRESENT——Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12