This is the most corrupt act by a sitting President in modern American history. It is not close.
I will use every tool I have in Congress to fight it. I will support every lawsuit challenging it. This must not stand.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is in addition to the $1.8 billion dollar January 6 Slush Fund to pay people Trump says were politically targeted, including the roughly 1,600 people charged in connection with the attack on the Capitol.
his trusts, his affiliates, and his family from any federal claim, prosecution, audit, damages, or action of any kind.
Permanent immunity for the President of the United States, his family, and his entire business empire.
This is atrocious.
Donald Trump’s former personal criminal defense lawyer, now serving as Acting Attorney General of the United States, signed a one-page document in which the United States government “RELEASES, WAIVES, ACQUITS, and FOREVER DISCHARGES” Donald Trump, his sons, his businesses,
Members of Congress trading stocks in the industries they regulate is a terrible idea. I've fought for years to ban it, because the people writing our laws with confidential information shouldn't get to use it to line their pockets.
Republicans handed the wealthiest Americans another tax cut and mailed the invoice to families holding the most vulnerable people in this country together with their bare hands.
This is incredibly cruel. And every Republican who supported it owes these families an answer.
And the Trump administration’s response? RFK Jr. smears them as fraudsters.
House Republicans accuse them of getting paid to “hang out with their own families.”
These parents left careers. They bathe, feed, medicate, and monitor their loved ones around the clock. They save taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars each year by keeping them out of institutions.
It means a single dad in Colorado caring for his daughter could see his income cut by more than $90,000 and lose his home.
It means a Nebraska mother told reporters she was preparing to sell her house so her son could keep living.
Trump’s so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” cuts Medicaid by $1 trillion. Here is what that means in plain English.
It means a Maryland mom caring full-time for her disabled 28-year-old son loses $18,000 a year.
Trump sued his own government for $10 billion. Today he settled with the DOJ he runs and cut the judge out of the process.
The deal: a $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded slush fund his Attorney General controls, with no court oversight and no transparency. It’s the most corrupt scheme of his presidency.
Trump opened this “investigation” in January with a Truth Social post calling Newsom corrupt.
Four months later, the punishment arrived before any case did.
Punishing patients is not prosecuting fraud.
If you actually want to stop fraud, investigate fraudsters and prosecute them.
You don’t withhold $1.3 billion in Medicaid payments from a state where 14 million people, including qkids, seniors, and people with disabilities, depend on that care.
Every one with billions riding on decisions his administration makes.
We must put a stop to this.
Ban stock trading for the President, Vice President, Cabinet, and every member of Congress.
No loopholes.
He launched a personal cryptocurrency that foreign buyers used to funnel money straight to his family.
And now we learn his account made 3,700 trades in a single quarter, more than 40 a day, in companies like Nvidia, Oracle, Microsoft, and Boeing.
No divestment or blind trust.
His sons run a global business empire that cuts deals with foreign governments.
His son-in-law manages billions for Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE while serving as Trump’s “volunteer” envoy on the war in Iran.
Joe Biden held no individual stocks either.
None were required to by law. They did it because they understood public office is a public trust, not a personal trading desk.
Trump is shredding that tradition.
Ronald Reagan liquidated his investments in 1981 and handed them to an independent trustee with no contact and no control.
George H.W. Bush did it.
Bill Clinton did it.
George W. Bush did it.
Barack Obama kept his money in Treasury bonds and owned no stock as president.
For nearly 50 years, every president separated their personal finances from the office.
Jimmy Carter put his family peanut business in a trust so no one could claim he profited from his decisions.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12