Brad Sherman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 32
Born
October 24, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-5911
Office
2365 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32

Brad Sherman

Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 32

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Brad Sherman headshot
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This will be an opportunity for our community to come together and discuss all the critical issues we face: our recovery from the #LosAngelesWildfires, #DonaldTrump and #ElonMusk's dismantling of critical services, the impact of Trump's escalating trade war and much more.
We'll be hosting an In-Person #TownHall for constituents of California's 32nd District on Saturday, April 26, from 2:30 PM - 4 PM, at California State University Northridge (CSUN) Register to Attend ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/Register Tickets will be sent to residents of CA-32 who register.
Secretary #Hegseth lied to the American people, saying that “nobody was texting war plans” when that’s exactly what he was doing – down to the very minute of the strike. Hegseth’s actions directly endangered American servicemembers & blatantly mishandled classified information. #HegsethMustResign
Join our Telephone #TownHall tonight at 7 PM to voice your thoughts on the many critical issues facing the country. We will be joined by two special guests to discuss challenging the Trump-Musk actions: ➡️ California Attorney General Rob Bonta ➡️ @democracyforward.org Senior Advisor Nikki McKinney
Today, I reintroduced my bill, the Accountability for Terrorist Perpetrators of #October7th Act, to finally sanction the Popular Resistance Committees - a heinous group that's never been sanctioned by the U.S. despite waging terror against innocent Americans, Israelis and Palestinians for years. 1/2
Congressman @meeks.house.gov is right – this reckless breach of our national security by senior #Trump Admin. officials must be investigated by @houseforeign.bsky.social The American people deserve to know whether this Admin. mishandled classified information & put U.S. servicemembers at risk.
RM @meeks.house.gov: I'm immediately calling on Chairman Mast to hold a hearing on what might be the most astonishing breach of our national security in recent history, where top leadership from DOD, State, Treasury, the CIA & even the VP himself used a commercial messaging app—Signal—to... (1/3)
According to the #Trump admin, people who complain if their #SocialSecurity check doesn’t come for a month are mostly fraudsters. This SOB can’t imagine it’s somebody who actually needs the money to live. Commerce Sec. #Lutnick's model is his mother-in-law who has a billionaire as a son-in-law.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
615 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNO—Passed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNO—Passed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYES—Failed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 13Next →